Sunday, November 4, 2018

The Committee on Public Information


The Committee on Public Information On April 13, 1917, the US declared war on Germany. Within a week of this declaration, President Wilson had issued an executive order creating a federal agency to influence public opinion. This agency was the Committee of Public Information, led by George Creel, a newspaper reporter. The Committee was the nation’s first modern propaganda office. It was organized into multiple different divisions, each one controlling a different aspect of news and information. The Speaking Division consisted of the Four-Minute men, an army of volunteers that gave four-minute speeches wherever there was an audience. According to Creel, the men had given around 7.5 million speeches by the end of the war. Additionally, there was also a News Division and Film Division. They were able to control what newspapers published by restricting reporters’ access to soldiers, generals, and people involved in the war. In doing so, reporters were forced to use government press-releases and reports to meet the public demand for news about the war. Essentially, they could only report information that the government released. This strategy was extremely effective, with government-written reports in at least 20,000 newspaper columns each week. Newspapers also had to follow government guidelines about how to be “patriotic,” which basically meant they had to portray the war in a positive light that encouraged people to support the war. Additionally, the CPI released its own government newspaper, distributing it across the country to newspapers, post offices, and military bases. The Film Division released movies dramatizing the war, emphasizing the barbaric enemies and heroic Americans. This included three full-length films: Pershing's Crusaders (May 1918), America's Answer (to the Hun) (August 1918), Under Four Flags (November 1918). The CPI was also responsible for many of the now-famous propaganda pictorials, like Uncle Sam’s “I want you.” The Division of Pictorial Publicity developed over 1483 designs for posters and postcards, many drawn by volunteers as well as famous artists. These posters portrayed Germans as bloodthirsty Huns while urging people to support the war by buying bonds and enlisting bonds, aiming to shift public opinion from a position of neutrality to one of of support for the war. Though the CPI proved effective in its task, there were incidents that revealed the spread of misinformation through the government. For example, a government report that claimed ships had sank multiple German submarines was proved false after interviewing the ship’s captain in England. Another example was when the government claimed that American planes were flying to France, but it was revealed that there was in fact only one plane, and it was still being tested. These incidents led newspapers and reporters that had once complied with government regulations become skeptical of the information the government was spreading. The CPI and Creel was also criticized by others such as Walter Lippmann, who wrote about the violation of civil liberties. World War I was significant not only in its technology, but also because of the widespread effect it had on the actual citizens. In the US, this war was the first time propaganda had been used on a national scale. Many people who participated in the CPI realized the power of manipulating public opinion. Edward L. Bernays, a volunteer in the CPI, wrote about the importance of propaganda in controlling the masses, saying “Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government.” https://theconversation.com/how-woodrow-wilsons-propaganda-machine-changed-american-journalism-76270 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-woodrow-wilsons-propaganda-machine-changed-american-journalism-180963082/ http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/4970/ https://www.britannica.com/biography/George-Creel#ref172962 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_Public_Information

8 comments:

  1. I enjoyed reading your blog. It reminded me of the propaganda we learned about last year in mehap. I wonder how this propaganda influenced the feelings of disillusionment after the war and how it would influence the art movements.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really LOVED this blog post- it is phenomenal in that it shows the American propaganda and distorted visions during the first world war. I really just love how you describe in such fascinating detail the limits on freedom of expression by the government during the war.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I found this blog post very interesting, because you can see America using tactics of manipulation that are found all over the world in corrupt places of power. I also really liked how you talked about the german view of the huns.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This was really fascinating, it seems that the US government took a radical change in its policy during the first Great war. Shifting from not wanting to intervene and maintaining a relatively small government to expanding to becoming fairly interventionist. This is a prime example of this where the federal government went as far as some might say as to violate the first ammendment and gag those with progerman sentiments and propogated allied propaganda. I also think it's interesting how much the first great war gives us a clues at what the second would look like. Where propoganda makes a return as well as even more modernized and industrialized warefare.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I found this post very interesting. It is interesting to see that the government formed its own organization for propaganda. It sort of seems like a precursor to today's fake news.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really enjoyed your post. I knew nothing about the various sections and responsibilities of the Committee on Public Information before and this filled in a lot of missing info.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think this is especially important in modern times. We can never trust the government entirely, it is the duty of the people to speculate in order to maintain a good goverment

    ReplyDelete
  8. I love the last quote you brought up to summarize your blog post. Propaganda and limitations on Free Speech often go hand-in-hand, but they aren't exact opposites. Do you think that many of the graphics you mentioned were designed genuinely out of their artists' own opinions? I believe that while propaganda strengthened nationalism, nationalism could also support propaganda in the same way.

    ReplyDelete