Wednesday, December 12, 2018

WW2 Tanks

    WW2 saw the major developments in tanks from the traditional landships of WW1. Tanks saw their first appearance by the British when they manufactured tanks for the first time. One of the ways tanks became more influential and be a bigger part of the military was the Christie Suspension. The Christie Suspension added a longer suspension then the traditional leaf spring suspensions which increased the speeds of tanks. Even after this improvement the allies and the axis were in a arms race improving their armor and weapons of a tank. Even during these advancements, there were testings on amphibious tanks which could work on water.


Image result for churchill tank
The Churchill tank was a British model of a heavy infantry tank. The British made sure that their tanks supported their infantry advancements thus making them good for all terrain. Also, the Churchill was adequate since it could move up on steep terrain, but the only downside to the tank was that it was slow which made it an easy target to shoot.

Image result for sherman tank
While the British had the Churchill the Americans had the M4 Sherman. The reason that this is an iconic and useful tank of WW2 is that America could make them fast, cheap, and reliable which allowed this tanks to outnumber its competitors. Also due to its simple design, it was reliable and easy to fix.

Image result for tiger tank
The Tiger Tank is a heavy German tank with a lot of issues. Even tho for the time period the tank was technologically advanced and very superior tank but it had a lot of downsides since the production cost was relatively high. The tank was also prone to issues due to it being complex in nature with it having so many moving parts. The Tiger was also reliant on gasoline and couldn't operate well due to it having constant track failures.


2 comments:

  1. I can tell that you definitely made an effort to research this topic to provide a very detailed post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like how the tanks reflect the nation's ideals. For the Germans they produced masterpieces of tanks which cost a lot. Meanwhile the Americans were more about quantity so their tanks were produced cheap and quickly. I suppose for the Germans this started well for them because they could outgun the Allies' tanks, but in a battle of attrition they would begin to lose because how much it took to build these tanks. Meanwhile the Americans would be able to continuously produce M4 Shermans without worry. I wonder how the war could have gone if the roles were reversed. Would it have made a difference or would the end result be the same?

    ReplyDelete